WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, along with the Republican leaders of other key committees, including Senators John Boozman (R-Ark.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Richard Burr (R-N.C.), and Rob Portman (R-Ohio), today wrote to the White House Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases (SC-GHG) Co-Chairs requesting they provide their recommendations about planned use of the SC-GHG in federal decision making.
The letter, which is signed by ranking members with jurisdiction over departments that are part of the Working Group, calls for the Biden administration to live up to its commitment to transparency and provide the details of the wide-reaching implications of potential SC-GHG application, while also explaining the significant impacts of application of the SC-GHG to different government regulatory actions and policies.
“The opaque decision-making process this Administration has chosen on this significant issue will result in policies that ultimately hurt American consumers who are already facing rising energy and grocery prices, slow economic growth, and uncontrolled inflation. Given the potential wide-reaching application of the SC-GHG in decision-making, budgeting, and procurement, it is critically important for the Working Group to be transparent and accountable in its actions. The recommendations, if acted upon, will implicate serious policy decisions across the Executive Branch—decisions that will also have significant burdens and costs for state and local governments and the private sector and likely require funding or authorization from Congress,” the senators wrote.
This letter follows several letters Ranking Member Capito sent on the subject. In February, Ranking Member Capito sent a letter to President Biden asking asking the administration to postpone any current efforts to set interim cost values on the social cost of greenhouse gases to allow for greater oversight and accountability. In June, Ranking Member Capito sent another letter requesting basic information regarding the Working Group’s transparency and plans for public engagement. The White House Office of Science and Technology’s response stated the Working Group does not plan to hold any public meetings on the Group’s activities.
The full letter can be read here or below:
Dear Chair Rouse, Acting Director Young, and Director Lander,
We write to request that you, the “Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases” (Working Group) Co-Chairs, provide the Working Group’s recommendations regarding “areas of decision-making, budgeting, and procurement by the Federal Government” where “Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases” (SC-GHG) may or are expected to be used.
President Biden’s Executive Order (E.O.) 13990 required the Working Group to provide those recommendations to the President by no later than September 1, 2021. That deadline has lapsed and no insights have been offered to Congress or the American public on when and what to expect in these recommendations. This Administration has repeatedly failed to live up to its own commitment to transparency and “sharing accurate information with the American people.” The opaque decision-making process this Administration has chosen on this significant issue will result in policies that ultimately hurt American consumers who are already facing rising energy and grocery prices, slow economic growth, and uncontrolled inflation.
Given the potential wide-reaching application of the SC-GHG in decision-making, budgeting, and procurement, it is critically important for the Working Group to be transparent and accountable in its actions. The recommendations, if acted upon, will implicate serious policy decisions across the Executive Branch—decisions that will also have significant burdens and costs for state and local governments and the private sector and likely require funding or authorization from Congress.
As the Working Group continues to work behind closed doors, agencies are already using SC-GHG calculations in regulatory actions that impact all Americans. EPA has even gone so far as to strongly recommend the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) use the SC-GHG in the certification of natural gas infrastructure and environmental impact statements. The use of SC-GHG and other derivations thereof will be cited in many regulatory actions this Administration is pursuing to implement its plans to take a “whole-of-government” approach to climate.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan has confidently stated that regardless of any action by Congress “EPA is already aggressively using its rulemaking authority” and would be willing to wield broader regulatory authority to deliver on the Administration’s climate goals, especially the 50 to 52 percent emissions reduction goal outlined by the White House’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC)Lawmakers—including members of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works—have repeatedly requested that the White House release the information and potential regulatory actions underpinning the NDC projections, but have received no response. This reaction from the White House is disturbingly similar to the Administration’s response on SC-GHG to date.
As a critical part of our oversight responsibilities, we need to know whether, how, and when the Administration plans to use these figures moving forward. It is vital that the American public have confidence in the Working Group’s activities, and we must understand the government’s justifications for future policies utilizing the SC-GHG that could exacerbate many of the ongoing economic challenges and labor disruptions the policies of this Administration have already caused. Fulfilling our request to provide the recommendations to Congress is a necessary step for the Working Group to maintain public credibility and necessary transparency as it implements President Biden’s agenda.
We ask that you provide the Working Group’s recommendations, as required by E.O. 13990, no later than November 11, 2021. We look forward to your reply.
# # #