Contact: Matt Dempsey email@example.com 202-224-9797
Inhofe Launches "Climategate" Investigation
Warns Participants to Retain Documents
Washington, D.C.-Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, today sent letters to several scientists, some of whom allegedly manipulated data to prove the scientific "consensus" of global warming, as well as to the inspectors general of several federal agencies, notifying them to retain documents related to the release of emails from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit in England.
"The stakes in this controversy are significant, as it appears that the basis of federal programs, pending EPA rulemakings, and cap-and-trade legislation was contrived and fabricated," Sen. Inhofe said. "Moreover, it appears that, in an attempt to conceal the manipulation of climate data, information disclosure laws may have been violated.
"I certainly don't condone the manner in which these emails were released; however, now that they are in the public domain, lawmakers have an obligation to determine the extent to which the so-called ‘consensus' of global warming, formed with billions of taxpayer dollars, was contrived in the biased minds of the world's leading climate scientists."
The letters are the first step in the investigation of the climate scandal. Last week, emails released by a computer hacker revealed that several leading climate scientists allegedly manipulated climate data and research used by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). These scientists also appear to have refused outside access to their raw data, obstructed freedom of information requests, and plotted ways to prevent the publication of papers in peer-reviewed journals by scientists who question global warming alarmism.
LETTERS TO AGENCY OFFICIALS
LETTERS TO UNIVERSITY LABS
LETTERS TO SCIENTISTS
ROUND 2 LETTERS - DECEMBER 02, 2009
Link to 2005 Inhofe Senate Floor Speech: "Today, I will discuss something else - scientific integrity and how to improve it. Specifically, I will discuss the systematic and documented abuse of the scientific process by an international body that claims it provides the most complete and objective scientific assessment in the world on the subject of climate change - the United Nations-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC. I will conclude with a series of recommendations as to the minimum changes the IPCC must make if it is to restore its credibility."
- _Climategate_Boxerletter - (350.5 KBs)
- _Climategate_McClellan - (226.8 KBs)
- _ClimategateAmmann - (310.6 KBs)
- _ClimategateBradley - (297.2 KBs)
- _ClimategateChalmers - (219.8 KBs)
- _ClimategateEhlenbach - (223.7 KBs)
- _ClimategateForch - (219.2 KBs)
- _ClimategateHeatwold - (222.9 KBs)
- _ClimategateHoward - (218.4 KBs)
- _ClimategateHughes - (318.9 KBs)
- _ClimategateKarl - (318.2 KBs)
- _ClimategateLerner - (217.5 KBs)
- _ClimategateLettertoActingIG-EPA - (220.2 KBs)
- _ClimategateLettertoGC-OMB - (218.5 KBs)
- _ClimategateLettertoGC_CEQ - (214.3 KBs)
- _ClimategateLettertoIG-Commerce - (219.8 KBs)
- _ClimategateLettertoIG-DOE - (219.5 KBs)
- _ClimategateLettertoIG-Interior - (217.1 KBs)
- _ClimategateMann - (314.3 KBs)
- _ClimategateOverpeck - (305.6 KBs)
- _ClimategatePeterson - (296.1 KBs)
- _ClimategateSanter - (302.5 KBs)
- _ClimategateSchmidt - (300.8 KBs)
- _ClimategateSolomon - (300.9 KBs)
- _ClimategateTrenberth - (303.2 KBs)
- _ClimategateWendell - (224.5 KBs)
- _ClimategateWigley - (312.0 KBs)
- _ClimategateWood - (229.2 KBs)