Blogs - Blogs
Inhofe, Heartland Institute Present More than 15,000 Petitions Demanding Congress Rein in a ‘Rogue’ EPA
Media Advisory
November 26, 2012

Contact:

Matt Dempsey Matt_Dempsey@epw.senate.gov (202) 224-9797

Katie Brown Katie_Brown@epw.senate.gov (202) 224-2160        

  

***MEDIA ADVISORY***

 

Inhofe, Heartland Institute Present More than 15,000 Petitions Demanding Congress Rein in a ‘Rogue’ EPA

 

The Heartland Institute has collected more than 15,000 signatures on a petition demanding Congress rein in a “rogue” Environmental Protection Agency. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, and The Heartland Institute will present the petitions to Congress at a public event in the Capitol Visitors Center in Washington, DC on Tuesday, November 27 at 11 a.m.

 

WHAT: “Rein in the EPA” Petition Presentation and Press Conference

WHEN: Tuesday, November 27, 11 a.m. EST

WHERE: Capitol Visitors Center, SVC 215, Washington, DC

WHO: Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) and The Heartland Institute

MEDIA: Open to the public and all press

 CONTACT:

Matt Dempsey, Senator Inhofe’s Environment and Public Works Communications Director matt_dempsey@epw.senate.gov 202/224-9797

Jim Lakely, director of communications, The Heartland Institute, jlakely@heartland.org, 312/731-9364;

John Nothdurft, director of government relations, The Heartland Institute, jnothdurft@heartland.org, 662/801-2707.

PETITION: Click here for a PDF copy; click here for the Web page

 

Background

Senator Inhofe recently released a detailed Senate report that enumerates the slew of environmental regulations that the Obama-Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) quietly delayed or punted before the election. The Obama administration went to great lengths to hide this regulatory agenda before Election Day, even going so far as simply ignoring the law. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. § 602) requires that every administration publish its regulatory agenda every six months in the Federal Register.  Yet, the Obama administration has failed to comply with this law twice over the past year.

As the Senate report reveals, these rules taken together will inevitably result in the elimination of millions of American jobs, drive up the price of gas at the pump even more, impose construction bans on local communities, and essentially shut down American oil, natural gas, and coal production. The report puts the spotlight back on an Obama-EPA that has, as the Washington Post said, earned a 'reputation for abuse.'

Many in the media are following Senator Inhofe's lead and putting the spotlight on the Obama administration's failure to comply with the law by refusing to publish its regulatory agenda. As has been the case with every publication tracking this growing story, the Obama administration refused to comment. Below are links to much of the growing coverage of the “regulatory flood” as the Wall Street Journal editorial (included below) described it over the past weekend.

Growing Media Attention on Obama Administration Violating the Law By Failing to Publish Regulatory Agenda

Inhofe Blasts Obama Administration For Failing To Comply with Law, Hiding Costly Regulatory Agenda

Watch Inhofe Interview on Fox News Discussing Obama Punting on EPA Regulations Until After Election

New Senate Report Reveals Economic Pain of Obama-EPA Regulations Put on Hold Until After the Election

WSJ: Where's the Transparency, Mr. President?

EPA Silent on Inhofe-EPW Reprt Showing EPA Punting on Costly Regs Past Election

 

The Wall Street Journal

Editorial: Here Comes the Regulatory Flood

Costly rules held up for the election are about to roll over the economy.

Link to Editorial

President Obama's hyperactive regulators went on hiatus in 2011 to get through Election Day. Now with his second term secure, they're about to make up for lost time and then some.

The government defines "economically significant" rules as those that impose annual costs of $100 million or more, and the Bush, Clinton and Bush Administrations each ended up finalizing about 45 major rules per year. The average over Mr. Obama's first two years was 63 but then plunged to 44 for 2011 and 2012 so far. The bureaucracies didn't slow down. They merely postponed and built up a backlog that is about to hit the Federal Register.

We'd report the costs of the major-rule pipeline if we had current data. But the White House budget office document known as the unified agenda that reveals the regulations under development hasn't been published since fall 2011. The delay violates multiple federal laws and executive orders that require an agenda every six months, so we thought readers might like a rough guide to the regulatory flood that is about to roll through the economy.

• Health care. It begins with the Affordable Care Act, which has been in hibernation because it was the largest campaign liability. Since Election Day, the Health and Human Services Department has submitted a raft of key health rules for White House review that it has been sitting on for months.

Hiding the details paid off politically but also undermined ObamaCare's already slim prospects for success. Ahead of the law's go-live date of October 2013, states and industries will have less than a year to prepare to meet the new mandates.

Three of the rules were released right before Thanksgiving, so insurers are only now about to learn how they'll design and price coverage, since one new rule defines "essential benefits" they must include. Another deals with limits on how premiums can vary from person to person based on risk.

The most important void is ObamaCare's "exchanges," the clearinghouses where millions of individuals and small business will receive subsidized coverage. HHS hasn't said how they must be set up and function in practice, with the exception of "guidance" documents that make vague suggestions but don't have the force of law and are likely to be revoked. HHS is all but begging states to run the exchanges but hasn't clarified what they'd be signing up for.

Amid opposition from most of the 30 Republican Governors, many of whom are telling the feds to run an exchange on their behalf, HHS also hasn't laid out how this federal fallback will work. Other complex rule-makings will decide who is eligible for the exchanges, how Medicaid rules will change after the Supreme Court's ObamaCare ruling, and the future of Medicare Advantage's private coverage options.

• Financial services. According to a Davis-Polk analysis, only 133 or 33.4% of the 398 rule-makings the law firm estimates Dodd-Frank requires have been finalized. The law is ambiguous and other reviews suggest the figure could be closer to 500. As of November 1, some 132 rules haven't even been proposed, while the government has failed to meet 61% (or 144) of Dodd-Frank's legal deadlines.

Regulators are now finalizing rules on bank stress testing and capital and margin rules for the swaps markets, but there are still many costly items on the to-do list. Major uncertainty comes from the rolling exercise to determine which businesses are "systemically important," aside from the largest banks that have already been designated as too big to fail. This review never ends.

Also on the docket is an effort to define "qualified mortgages," which will change lending and capital standards. Elizabeth Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, having been invested with unaccountable powers, will now decide what financial products and services are "abusive," a political term of art with no legal meaning. Then there is the pending Volcker Rule to limit proprietary trading at big banks, whose draft ran to 298 pages and asked 1,347 questions.

• Energy. In the lead-up to November, the Environmental Protection Agency stood down under White House pressure, delaying rules for ozone air quality and industrial boilers, and deferring carbon standards. Now EPA chief Lisa Jackson has the run of the place.

She will resume the Administration's anti-carbon agenda through "new source performance standards," which will set greenhouse gas emissions for new power plants so low as to prevent their construction. Look for this early in 2013.

She'll follow with standards for "existing" sources that make coal-fired plants uneconomic to run. Inside of a decade, Ms. Jackson may wipe out what used to make up more than half of U.S. power generation. Environmentalists will write books about it, even if her agenda has received almost no public scrutiny or debate.

The oil and gas industry is also targeted, hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in particular. The EPA has already issued a rule on shale production emissions and has one coming on diesel fuel in fracking. The Interior Department is promulgating rules on fracking on federal lands, and other rules can't be far behind, probably using the pretext of drinking water under the Clean Water Act.

The EPA's sleeper issue is the National Enforcement Initiatives agenda, which is designed to use the agency's existing legal powers for inspections, requests for information, penalties and so forth to make new de facto rules. The EPA now blackmails businesses into "super compliance," or settlements far more stringent than the law requires, or else risk years of expensive litigation.

• Economic potpourri. The National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs are teaming up to rewrite employment, labor and workplace law. The FCC and the FTC are doing the same for the tech industry and Silicon Valley via investigations, audits and "oversight." The Agriculture Department is going after "illegally harvested plants." The Consumer Product Safety Commission has its eyes on . . . table saws.

***

Having come close to losing re-election because of a weak economy, Mr. Obama now keeps saying "our top priority has to be jobs and growth." This new regulatory flood will increase costs and uncertainty and make that priority that much harder to achieve.

 

Inhofe EPW Press Blog | YouTube | Twitter | Facebook | Podcast

###   





Majority Office
410 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg.Washington, DC 20510-6175
phone: 202-224-8832
Minority Office
456 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg.Washington, DC 20510-6175
phone: 202-224-6176