|
|
Kootenai Tribe
of Idaho
P.O. Box 1269 Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 Ph# (208) 267-3519 Fax (208) 267-2960 |
Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee
Subcommittee
on Fisheries, Wildlife and Water
406
Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington,
D.C. 20510-6175
RE:
Written Testimony of the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho before the Senate Environment
and Public Works Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Water regarding
Implementation of the National Marine Fisheries Service’s 2000 Biological
Opinion for Listed Anadromous Fish regarding Operation of Federal Columbia
River Power System
Dear Senator Crapo:
The
Kootenai Tribe of Idaho appreciates all of the work you have done on behalf of
the Tribe and on behalf of all Idaho and Northwest residents. The Tribe also appreciates your attention to
the complex issues concerning implementation of the National Marine Fisheries
Service’s (NMFS) 2000 biological opinion for listed anadromous fish regarding
operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS).
The Tribe’s activities
in the Columbia River Basin focus mainly on implementation of appropriate
measures in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s biological opinion
for the Kootenai River white sturgeon and bull trout and collaborative,
community-based approaches to restoration of other resident fish and wildlife
species. The Tribe recognizes, however, the interconnectedness of the Basin
ecosystem and the necessity of anadromous fish recovery to Basin restoration.
Moreover, the challenges facing the Tribe in resident fish and wildlife
recovery are similar, if not identical, to those facing anadromous fish
recovery.
The Tribe would like to
point out its efforts in overcoming these challenges. As you know, the Kootenai
Tribe was instrumental in working with local governing bodies to form the
Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative (KVRI) in order to restore and enhance the
resources of the Kootenai Valley. The mission of the KVRI is to improve
coordination of local, state, federal and Tribal programs to restore and
maintain social, cultural, economic and natural resources. It utilizes a number
of subcommittees to work with the group as appropriate to accomplish the tasks
at hand. We are excited about the possibilities this sort of collaboration can
achieve. This type of cooperation among all stakeholders is the only way to
ensure proper implementation of the biological opinions and achieve restoration
of the Basin as a whole.
BPA and the other federal agencies must develop, through
collaboration with the Tribes and the states, a process to establish permanent
and appropriate funding levels to meet Treaty and trust obligations and the
mandates of the Northwest Power Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National
Historic Preservation Act and the Clean Water Act. The costs for fulfilling
these responsibilities should be allocated among federal agencies and funding
sources for paying these costs clarified in accordance with the law.
The Tribe also suggests that much needed stability for
the fish and wildlife managers can be achieved by entering into multi-year
contracts with BPA for funding of projects. The Basin recently switched from an
annual review process to a three-year rolling review process for project
recommendation and approval. The rolling review process was intended to
streamline the process and allow fish and wildlife managers to spend more time
restoring the Basin and less time stranded in paperwork and processes. The next
logical step would be to provide three years of funding for a project that has
been approved for three years. Unfortunately, BPA refuses to enter into
multiple year contracts with fish and wildlife managers, limiting contracts to
one-year periods. In actuality, refusal to enter into multiple year contracts
has resulted in fish and wildlife managers continuing to spend more time in
processes and less time restoring the Basin.
Many in the Basin feel that the
Northwest ratepayers are paying more than their fair share for implementation
of the Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation
Act and other legal responsibilities.
Throughout the rest of the United States, fulfillment of these national
responsibilities are funded by the federal government under federal authority
and by state governments under state authority. In the Columbia River Basin,
however, the other federal agencies and the states look primarily to BPA for
funding. Thus, ratepayers are required
to bear the entire burden for the Columbia River Basin as well as their share
of the national burden. Congress needs to recognize its responsibility, step
forward and provide adequate appropriations to ensure federally mandated
programs are fully funded in order to accomplish habitat improvement, clean
water and species recovery and not force the Basin to bear more than its fair
share.
In addition to the need for national
fairness in funding, there exists a need for Basin-wide fairness. An important
example of the deficiency in equitable Basin-wide funding is the failure to
include Idaho in the Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Fund. Anadromous fish do not
recognize state boundaries. It is a biological fact that these species
historically migrated to and from the headwaters of the Columbia River and its
tributaries. Despite this biological fact, Idaho does not receive its fair
share of funding to insure proper recovery of anadromous fish native to its
waters.
The Tribe believes, however, that no
level of funding will successfully ensure species recovery if collaboration
among the Tribes, states, federal agencies and other stakeholders does not
improve. Consistent with its belief that collaboration is the key to species
recovery, the Tribe, in addition to its efforts with the KVRI, works closely
with its sister Tribes in the Basin. One forum for this collaboration is the
Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT), consisting of the Colville, Spokane,
Kalispel, Coeur d’Alene and Kootenai Tribes. The UCUT recognizes the
interconnectedness of the Columbia River Basin and coordinates management
activities to ensure that the actions of one do not harm the goals of another.
The KVRI is an example of a
community-based, collaborative effort in the Basin. Unfortunately, this type of
cooperation does not occur at all levels in the Basin to the extent that it
should. While the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority has worked hard
toward collaboration among fish and wildlife managers, more needs to be done to
ensure that the limited resources of the Basin are devoted to species recovery
and restoration rather than processes and litigation.
The Tribe suggests that greater
intergovernmental cooperation can and should be fostered through the
development of a regional governance group that would include representation
from the Tribes, federal agencies and the states, and that would connect these
governance efforts with local community-based approaches to species
restoration. The Tribe urges the Committee to encourage the federal agencies to
immediately begin negotiating a formal and comprehensive role for the Tribes. Such
a regional governance group would further Basin restoration and species
recovery and move the region toward a more collaborative effort.
The
Tribe thanks the Chairman and Committee for the opportunity to address species
recovery and restoration in the Columbia River Basin. The Tribe also wishes to
express its appreciation for the Chairman’s commitment to being “hands-on” with
the KVRI’s efforts at home in Idaho as we continue to work diligently toward
collaboration.
Sincerely yours,
Gary Aitken, Sr.
Chairman