EPW
CONFIRMATION HEARING 4/1/03
SENATOR
BOND
Mr.
Chairman, I appreciate your holding this hearing during such a busy work period
and I am grateful for your leadership and support on issues that relate to the
Corps of Engineers. In particular, I
welcome an able nominee and very highly-regarded constituent, Mr. R.D. James
who was recommended by Senator Lincoln from Arkansas and myself. Mr. James is a great advocate for the Corps
and the people who the Corps serves on the Mississippi River and he has an
acute understanding of the issues that relate to water resources management. In addition, R.D. is a good and trusted
friend and I hope the Committee gives him a warm welcome and moves his nomination
with dispatch because he is eager to go back to work.
The
Corps is a trusted and critical partner to our communities, farmers, shippers,
energy providers and others. Historic
investment in Corps programs by visionaries of the past has yielded dramatic
economic stimulus to our communities.
The numbers speak for themselves.
Every
year, Congress yields a referendum on the value of the Corps by making hundreds
of individual project-by-project requests and additions to the Energy and Water
Appropriations bill because the demand for these investments is high and its
support is bipartisan and broad-based.
The Corps does not undertake any projects that are not first authorized
and then appropriated by Congress.
Regrettably,
while we have elevated these investments over Administration requests, more is
necessary and I look forward to working with the Chairman to ensure that the
mission of the Corps remains not just viable but active. Further, I believe it
is past time to make the kind of long-term investments that will do justice to
the legacy of those forward-thinkers who have provided for our economic
opportunity. The decisions today will
be the basis for our competitiveness for our children and grandchildren and I
have no intention of rolling back our commitment to their future.
When
confirmed, Mr. Woodley will have a big job ahead of him that will test his skill
and test his spine. It will require him
to weigh competing views from passionate stakeholders to solve problems and
ultimately make decisions and stand by them.
The Corps is the Agency with the responsibility to represent not just
fish and wildlife and not just producers and not just recreational fishermen. They have to balance all needs which is why
they are in the vortex of controversy.
Their job is made more difficult by the unwillingness of Congress to
debate and identify priorities.
Consequently, the Corps has been under a great deal of fire from people
who don't get their way. With the Corps
under increasing pressure to make difficult decisions, strong leadership is necessary
to protect the role of the Corps and to ensure that the Agency is represented
when inter-agency struggles arise. Few
people want the job of Assistant Secretary but plenty of people in the
Administration want to run the Corps from other Agencies.
There are dozens of issues that must be disposed of. Returning some certainty to the Missouri River Master Manual management is critical. The review began in the 1980s with no resolution. President Clinton and his Administration studied, proposed, withdrew, and re-studied this matter fro eight years without resolution. A decision needs to be made to remove the uncertainty which is stifling investment and perpetuating political unrest in the basin communities.
In the
period after confirmation, I look forward to the opportunity to make the case
on those issues critical to Missouri.